| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
cm0002
europe.pub
cm0002@europe.pub Joined: 2025-11-06 |
|
||
| 86 Original | |||
leoj
piefed.social
leoj@piefed.socialJoined: 2026-03-06 |
I think this is good, right? Feels like the first time the supreme court has done something I agree with in a while... |
||
| 42 | |||
|
Venia Silente
lemmy.dbzer0.com
veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2025-06-09 |
wth does "without intent" mean? Like, ooops my AI accidentally 1.41 TB of books and movies? |
||
| 17 | |||
|
Wizard3964
lemmy.dbzer0.com
Wizard3964@lemmy.dbzer0.com Joined: 2026-03-03 |
I think this is good, right? Feels like the first time the supreme court has done something I agree with in a while...
ISP has more money than music industry |
||
| 9 | |||
|
cm0002
europe.pub
cm0002@europe.pub Joined: 2025-11-06 |
wth does "without intent" mean? Like, ooops my AI accidentally 1.41 TB of books and movies?
Intent meaning they're not an ISP that caters to piracy E.g. you start an ISP called Pirate Connections, advertise that you cater to piracy and have specific piracy friendly features (optimized for torrents, gang planks, minimal logging etc) is bad |
||
| 24 | |||
|
cm0002
europe.pub
cm0002@europe.pub Joined: 2025-11-06 |
I think this is good, right? Feels like the first time the supreme court has done something I agree with in a while...
It's very good, but it's also one of those things where they did the right things (essentially preventing forcing an ISP to be a enforcer of sorts) for the wrong reasons (Cox had more money) |
||
| 28 | |||
|
Kairos
lemmy.today
LodeMike@lemmy.today Joined: 2023-12-26 |
I think this is good, right? Feels like the first time the supreme court has done something I agree with in a while...
Yes |
||
| 3 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |