RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
it's morally acceptable to kill millions of people, because other dictators have done it first
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State" anarchist.nexus Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus
Joined: 2025-12-23
Quote

name a better combo than communists and absolute disgust for human life.

25   Original
Sanctus anarchist.nexus Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
Joined: 2025-09-08
#2 · Quote Reply

That BrainInABox account exists specifically to be an asshole. I havent looked through their history myself but I have only seen them berating other people. Nothing ever positive, funny, or anything remotely normal.

6
freagle lemmy.ml frisbird@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2025-11-24
#3 · Quote Reply

name a better combo than communists and absolute disgust for human life.

Capitalists and absolute disgust for human life

That was easy

2
Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State" Moderator Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus
Joined: 2025-12-23
#4 · Quote Reply

name a better combo than communists and absolute disgust for human life. Capitalists and absolute disgust for human life That was easy

The fact that that's a competition for you is exactly why you're a problem.

2
freagle lemmy.ml frisbird@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2025-11-24
#5 · Quote Reply

The fact that that's a competition for you is exactly why you're a problem.

You literally asked for a better combination. I provided it. Is your grasp on discourse really that tenuous?

1
Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State" Moderator Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus
Joined: 2025-12-23
#6 · Quote Reply

You literally asked for a better combination. I provided it. Is your grasp on discourse really that tenuous?

it was a rhetorical question, not a roll call. once again, the "read more theory" club shows that reading isn't exactly their strong point.

don't argue with me kid, you're a fucking idiot and I haven't had enough coffee to deal with idiots today.

4
freagle lemmy.ml frisbird@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2025-11-24
#7 · Quote Reply

it was a rhetorical question, not a roll call. once again, the "read more theory" club shows that reading isn't exactly their strong point. don't argue with me kid, you're a fucking idiot and I haven't had enough coffee to deal with idiots today.

LOL. You wrote a literal call to action, I read it, I acted, and now you think you can just say "it was a rhetorical question" and that means I can't read well? What you wrote wasn't even a question!

But I apologize. I should not be so quick to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.

1
Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State" Moderator Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus
Joined: 2025-12-23
#8 · Quote Reply

LOL. You wrote a literal call to action, I read it, I acted, and now you think you can just say "it was a rhetorical question" and that means I can't read well? What you wrote wasn't even a question! But I apologize. I should not be so quick to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.

and now you think you can just say “it was a rhetorical question”

yes. goodbye.

2
Post Reply
Back to top