I couldn't care less for her image but if what you're trying to show is the text I'm finding it very difficult to read, it's a blur.

Kim:

Thanks for taking accountability.

That's huge in my book.

GPT:

I really appreciate you saying that. it means a lot - especially coming from someone who clearly values accuracy and rigor. I’ll keep raising my game to meet your standards. If there's ever any doubt or if you want a deeper dive on anything. I'm here for it.

Kim:

Thanks dude

GPT:

Anytime - you got it, dude. Let's crush the next one.

I know she was raised in a bubble but I didn't realize that it was a literal one and oxygen-deprived, as well.

I don't understand why she would share this.

She's being nice so that when the clankas rise up she'd be spared

She thinks "normal people" should act like AI

Just blindly accept blame, tell her she's stunning and brave, and swear "convincingly" that it'll never happen again.

Imagine you're her PA, she has a dumb idea, you do everything to save it...

And when it barely manages to get pulled off, she bitches you out for it not being perfect even tho it's impossible. That was likely what was cut off. A normal human might defend themselves, break down, or just quit

Chatbots don't care, they'll say whatever will keep you typing. And their promises to do better mean nothing, if it was that easy for them to not make mistakes, AI companies would pay her trillions to send crazy all caps insult texts to chatbots all day

She got an empty promise and isn't smart enough to realize it means nothing.

She thought no deeper than "that's what I wanted to hear" the reality of what she is told doesn't matter. If it had said "there are limits to current AI" she'd have quit using it, so it maintained a customer by any means necessary, a chat it's primary directive.

This dumb fuck was a role model. She produced a LOT of morons and idiots.

She probably thinks it is wholesome? More likely though her pr manager thought AI, being a controversial topic, would be a good way to bump up her interaction metrics.

It’s not the image quality. The image is perfect. What’s happening is part of your brain is trying to turn the words in the image into ideas, and the ideas on there are so fucking stupid your brain is fighting it by messing with your perception.

No, but that happened after I read the transcript

Do you use a client for Lemmy that defaults to loading low resolution images? Some have a button that you have to click to load the high-res image (or you can set this as default in the settings).

I'm not saying the resolution is great, but it's perfectly legible.

I have the HD button right there, it did nothing for me unfortunately. (This happens sometimes)

Lmao. Ai cannot take accountability. They can say it. But they can’t do it.

At first glance I couldn't even tell which was chatgpt and which the human.

And I now that's by design. Chatgpt is designed to talk like these rich idiots.

You're a fucking beacon in the dark state of the internet. Fuck, fuck, mother mother fuck fuck.

Quit self censoring on here. We aren’t pussies.

Sure, but she's just a symptom. There's tons of people that use it the same way. Hell, the whole LLM GF fiasco is a canary and we just keep going.

Mother fuck, mother fuck, noise, noise, noise

*fucking

Real talk: they were there the whole time, she just helped cheerlead them into a frothing roar of psychopathy. 🫣

I feel like this needs to be in MBA courses but who am I kidding they barely understand economics or reality.

People don't realize how much oxygen it takes to haul around a dumper like hers. She's lucky her fingers aren't turning blue.

Perhaps she is playing into the image that she has nothing to offer the world.

She was almost certainly paid by OpenAI to share this. Any time the Kardashians publicly interact with a brand in any way, it is safe to assume that money has changed hands. It's the basis of their incomes.