RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
South Korea protests Japanese event over disputed islands
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
schizoidman lemmy.zip schizoidman@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-18
Quote

The tiny islets, known as Takeshima in Japan and Dokdo in South Korea, which controls them, have long been a source of tension between the two neighbours, whose relations remain strained by disputes rooted in Japan's colonial rule of the Korean peninsula from 1910 to 1945.

37   Original
ms.lane lemmy.world ms_lane@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-06-03
#2 · Quote Reply

In a statement, the foreign ministry said it strongly objected to the Takeshima Day event held by Japan's Shimane prefecture

They're upset another country had a festival...

No fun allowed in Korea.

-3
iturnedintoanewt lemmy.world iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-17
#3 · Quote Reply

In a statement, the foreign ministry said it strongly objected to the Takeshima Day event held by Japan's Shimane prefecture They're upset another country had a festival... No fun allowed in Korea.

Sure, a country celebrating an ownership festival over some island controlled by a different country. I wonder why the other country might be upset?

2
Siegfried lemmy.world Siegfried@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-01
#4 · (edited) Quote Reply

Sure, a country celebrating an ownership festival over some island controlled by a different country. I wonder why the other country might be upset?

It's a little worse than that.

Imaging Germany doing a festival conmemorating retaking the polish corridor... and not as a traditional festival but as something they started doing like in 2005.

3
Hotznplotzn lemmy.sdf.org Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org
Joined: 2025-01-29
Banned
#5 · Quote Reply

'Welcome to CHINA' greets Philippine officials on trip to disputed South China Sea

  • Philippine officials visit Thitu amid Chinese presence
  • Roaming message says "Welcome to CHINA"
  • Filipino fishermen say China stops them fishing best waters
  • China claims most of South China Sea despite 2016 Hague ruling
1
Post Reply
Back to top