| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » science |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
NomNom
feddit.uk
NomNom@feddit.uk Joined: 2026-02-13 |
|
||
| 16 Original | |||
|
xylogx
lemmy.world
xylogx@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-26 |
This seems like a bad idea. How do you protect against spoofing? Seems inferior to traditional smart cards and private key crypto. |
||
| 1 | |||
|
pulsewidth
lemmy.world
pulsewidth@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-01-29 |
This seems like a bad idea. How do you protect against spoofing? Seems inferior to traditional smart cards and private key crypto.
Just read it, they explain - those MIT peeps are pretty smart. There is no stored secret to spoof or stored hash that could be accessed and to bruteforce, it uses hardware measurments that are in unique pairs due to the manufacturing process. Like two halves of a cracked stone, only the original two will fit together perfectly. Its not intended for replacing every current security methodology, they give only a few examples of what it could be used for - or it might never come to market, it's just interesting research at this stage.
|
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |