Link: https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/new-jersey-woman-arrested-ice-sparks-debate-1790829

The arrest took place just moments after she had provided evidence intended to hold her alleged attacker accountable.

According to the advocate who accompanied her, the federal agents were not wearing uniforms. They forced the 'screaming' woman into an unmarked vehicle before driving away. When the advocate attempted to seek help, police officers reportedly told her: 'We can't do a thing. They're ICE.'

I have been informed that ibtimes.co.uk is not a trustworthy news outlet and that this is a much better source:
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2026/04/ice-deportation-domestic-violence-victims/686629/

Here's the article from The Atlantic instead of this slimy puddle of filth that calls itself a news outlet.

Maybe one day I'll whip up a canned explanation. For now, "we strive not to use this sewage as a source on Wikipedia" is hopefully good enough shorthand.

(Note that the likely only reason it's not deprecated (level 4) like the Daily Mail and is only "generally unreliable" (level 3) like Fox News' coverage of politics and science is because the former requires an RfC, and that takes time and effort to set up, conduct, and resolve.)

Thank you. I'll try not to use this as a source in the future.