RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
US gov't blocks China's largest LED chipmaker's $239 million bid to acquire Dutch lighting firm Lumileds — US blocks acquisition attempt of European firm
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
Rekall Incorporated piefed.social Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-08
Quote

Semiconductors using gallium nitride tech continue to be a red line for CFIUS.

51   Original
nooch lemmy.vg nooch@lemmy.vg
Joined: 2026-01-04
#2 · Quote Reply

Very visible hand of the market

14
ikt aussie.zone Eyekaytee@aussie.zone
Joined: 2023-06-17
#3 · Quote Reply

I didn't know you could do that

7
Pumpkin Escobar lemmy.world PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-12
#4 · Quote Reply

I didn't know you could do that

When you're deranged they let you do it.

5
zout fedia.io zout@fedia.io
Joined: 2024-03-16
#5 · Quote Reply

Great article, especially where they don't explain at all how the US government can block the acquisition of of a Dutch company.

32
inari piefed.zip inari@piefed.zip
Joined: 2026-02-07
#6 · Quote Reply

Great article, especially where they don't explain at all how the US government can block the acquisition of of a Dutch company.

That's what I wanted to know. Thanks for the heads up, saved me a click

7
teslekova sh.itjust.works teslekova@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-01-09
#7 · Quote Reply

Great article, especially where they don't explain at all how the US government can block the acquisition of of a Dutch company.

It seems that the Chinese company chose to abandon the acquisition. I see three possible reasons.

This may have been part of a wider Chinese negotiation with the US on security technology. It might have destabilised some position or other, cost more in US hostility elsewhere, etc.

Also, the Dutch do tend to be very cooperative with US government demands, if they are tolerable; the Chinese company might simply have recognised that the Dutch would now block the acquisition at the request of the US.

Third, the US could easily block the company's trade permissions, stopping its access to a key world market. That would have made the acquisition far less profitable, and the company would have no reason to continue.

0
Bloomcole lemmy.world Bloomcole@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-02-17
#8 · Quote Reply

Great article, especially where they don't explain at all how the US government can block the acquisition of of a Dutch company.

It's no longer a Dutch company but owned by american investors

12
Bloomcole lemmy.world Bloomcole@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-02-17
#9 · Quote Reply

It seems that the Chinese company chose to abandon the acquisition. I see three possible reasons. This may have been part of a wider Chinese negotiation with the US on security technology. It might have destabilised some position or other, cost more in US hostility elsewhere, etc. Also, the Dutch do tend to be very cooperative with US government demands, if they are tolerable; the Chinese compa...

You missed the real reason, that it's not a Dutch company but owned by US investors Anchorage Capital Group, Nut Tree Capital Management, and Cerberus Capital Management

4
Post Reply
Back to top