| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Hardware |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Rekall Incorporated
piefed.social
Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
Semiconductors using gallium nitride tech continue to be a red line for CFIUS. |
||
| 51 Original | |||
|
nooch
lemmy.vg
nooch@lemmy.vg Joined: 2026-01-04 |
Very visible hand of the market |
||
| 14 | |||
ikt
aussie.zone
Eyekaytee@aussie.zoneJoined: 2023-06-17 |
I didn't know you could do that |
||
| 7 | |||
|
Pumpkin Escobar
lemmy.world
PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world Joined: 2023-06-12 |
I didn't know you could do that
When you're deranged they let you do it. |
||
| 5 | |||
|
zout
fedia.io
zout@fedia.io Joined: 2024-03-16 |
Great article, especially where they don't explain at all how the US government can block the acquisition of of a Dutch company. |
||
| 32 | |||
inari
piefed.zip
inari@piefed.zipJoined: 2026-02-07 |
Great article, especially where they don't explain at all how the US government can block the acquisition of of a Dutch company.
That's what I wanted to know. Thanks for the heads up, saved me a click |
||
| 7 | |||
|
teslekova
sh.itjust.works
teslekova@sh.itjust.works Joined: 2026-01-09 |
Great article, especially where they don't explain at all how the US government can block the acquisition of of a Dutch company.
It seems that the Chinese company chose to abandon the acquisition. I see three possible reasons. This may have been part of a wider Chinese negotiation with the US on security technology. It might have destabilised some position or other, cost more in US hostility elsewhere, etc. Also, the Dutch do tend to be very cooperative with US government demands, if they are tolerable; the Chinese company might simply have recognised that the Dutch would now block the acquisition at the request of the US. Third, the US could easily block the company's trade permissions, stopping its access to a key world market. That would have made the acquisition far less profitable, and the company would have no reason to continue. |
||
| 0 | |||
|
Bloomcole
lemmy.world
Bloomcole@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-02-17 |
Great article, especially where they don't explain at all how the US government can block the acquisition of of a Dutch company.
It's no longer a Dutch company but owned by american investors |
||
| 12 | |||
|
Bloomcole
lemmy.world
Bloomcole@lemmy.world Joined: 2025-02-17 |
It seems that the Chinese company chose to abandon the acquisition. I see three possible reasons. This may have been part of a wider Chinese negotiation with the US on security technology. It might have destabilised some position or other, cost more in US hostility elsewhere, etc. Also, the Dutch do tend to be very cooperative with US government demands, if they are tolerable; the Chinese compa...
You missed the real reason, that it's not a Dutch company but owned by US investors Anchorage Capital Group, Nut Tree Capital Management, and Cerberus Capital Management |
||
| 4 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |