RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
A short summary of the not war with Iran
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
FoxtrotDeltaTango sh.itjust.works FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-01-20
Quote

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/46206701

527   Original
unmagical lemmy.ml unmagical@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2023-10-30
#2 · Quote Reply

One of the identifiers of fascism is that one's enemy is strong, needing to be stopped, and so weak they could never resist us.

52
shittydwarf sh.itjust.works shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-05-05
#3 · Quote Reply

Not to mention that they blew up the supreme leader who had issued a complete and total ban on nuclear weapons

32
NOT_RICK lemmy.world NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-12
#4 · Quote Reply

One of the identifiers of fascism is that one's enemy is strong, needing to be stopped, and so weak they could never resist us.

Anyone that hasn’t read Umberto Eco’s essay Ur Fascism that this notion is from should get on it.

22
Shortstack reddthat.com Shortstack@reddthat.com
Joined: 2023-07-01
#5 · Quote Reply

If anything, it underscores the importance of actually having nuclear weapons as a deterrence. If Iran actually did have nukes we would not be picking fights with them

87
ricecake sh.itjust.works ricecake@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-11
#6 · Quote Reply

If anything, it underscores the importance of actually having nuclear weapons as a deterrence. If Iran actually did have nukes we would not be picking fights with them

Ukraine as well. One is a story about why you should try to aquire nuclear weapons as quickly as possible and the other is a story about why you should never give them up, even if you think it's a bad idea that you have them and have serious doubts that you could maintain them safely or use them effectively.

It's like goddamned advertising for nukes.

68
IrateAnteater sh.itjust.works IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-09-07
#7 · Quote Reply

Does Iran even need a full fledged navy to keep the straight closed? The straight is narrow. A couple of gun boats and missiles launched from shore would be enough to keep most commercial shipping out.

18
Unpigged lemmy.dbzer0.com Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2023-11-14
#8 · Quote Reply

... In the shithouse that Donald built.

11
mrdown lemmy.world mrdown@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-07-20
#9 · Quote Reply

If anything, it underscores the importance of actually having nuclear weapons as a deterrence. If Iran actually did have nukes we would not be picking fights with them

Sure but st the same time. If iran was seeking a nuke years ago . The usa eould have attacked earlier when Iran was weaker

2
mrdown lemmy.world mrdown@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-07-20
#10 · Quote Reply

Not to mention that they blew up the supreme leader who had issued a complete and total ban on nuclear weapons

While true the fatwa do not get removed by the desth of the supreme leader. The new one should remove it. It doesn't seem the fatwa with be removed

3
WanderingThoughts europe.pub WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
Joined: 2025-03-31
#11 · Quote Reply

because Iran is weeks away from building the atomic bomb since 1995

42
frunch lemmy.world frunch@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-13
#12 · Quote Reply

If anything, it underscores the importance of actually having nuclear weapons as a deterrence. If Iran actually did have nukes we would not be picking fights with them

It never occurred to me that the beef the US has with other countries having nukes is because it would put them on even footing. No nukes = no leverage.

27
CanadaPlus futurology.today CanadaPlus@futurology.today
Joined: 2023-11-19
#13 · (edited) Quote Reply

It never occurred to me that the beef the US has with other countries having nukes is because it would put them on even footing. No nukes = no leverage.

TBF lots of countries think everyone having nukes is a bad idea. It's just so nice to be one of the few that does...

15
The D Quuuuuill slrpnk.net Quill7513@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2023-06-26
#14 · Quote Reply

TBF lots of countries think everyone having nukes is a bad idea. It's just so nice to be one of the few that does...

only three countries have ever had nukes and willingly handed them over to de-escalate tensions about everyone having nukes: Ukraine, Belarus, and Pakistan. All three are consistent battlegrounds of the global northern empires now. the nuclear countries have demonstrated, it seems, to the global south that the adults table at the UN is who has nukes and if you get nukes and give them up, you will be punished for your good faith

8
Geobloke aussie.zone Geobloke@aussie.zone
Joined: 2025-06-30
#15 · Quote Reply

only three countries have ever had nukes and willingly handed them over to de-escalate tensions about everyone having nukes: Ukraine, Belarus, and Pakistan. All three are consistent battlegrounds of the global northern empires now. the nuclear countries have demonstrated, it seems, to the global south that the adults table at the UN is who has nukes and if you get nukes and give them up, you wi...

What about South Africa?

5
CanadaPlus futurology.today CanadaPlus@futurology.today
Joined: 2023-11-19
#16 · (edited) Quote Reply

only three countries have ever had nukes and willingly handed them over to de-escalate tensions about everyone having nukes: Ukraine, Belarus, and Pakistan. All three are consistent battlegrounds of the global northern empires now. the nuclear countries have demonstrated, it seems, to the global south that the adults table at the UN is who has nukes and if you get nukes and give them up, you wi...

Uhh, Pakistan still has a bunch of nukes, Kazakhstan gave theirs up at the same time as the other two, and South Africa had them and gave them up. Also there's no war in Pakistan, and only war at a low level in Belarus (and they're the aggressor).

17
The D Quuuuuill slrpnk.net Quill7513@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2023-06-26
#17 · Quote Reply

Uhh, Pakistan still has a bunch of nukes, Kazakhstan gave theirs up at the same time as the other two, and South Africa had them and gave them up. Also there's no war in Pakistan, and only war at a low level in Belarus (and they're the aggressor).

thanks. i wrote that up real fast and i got my countries mixed up. and in the case of Belarus what i was talking about is that their existence as a russian colony has been perhaps more strongly cemented than back when they were a union republic of the ussr

6
psud aussie.zone psud@aussie.zone
Joined: 2023-07-26
#18 · Quote Reply

thanks. i wrote that up real fast and i got my countries mixed up. and in the case of Belarus what i was talking about is that their existence as a russian colony has been perhaps more strongly cemented than back when they were a union republic of the ussr

Pakistan couldn't lose their nukes, they need them to MAD with India

4
The D Quuuuuill slrpnk.net Quill7513@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2023-06-26
#19 · Quote Reply

Pakistan couldn't lose their nukes, they need them to MAD with India

yeah i don't even know why in my head i didn't flag that when i was literally thinking about how anxiety inducing it is how many of the nations with nukes are run by authoritarian freaks

2
emergencyfood sh.itjust.works emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-03
#20 · Quote Reply

only three countries have ever had nukes and willingly handed them over to de-escalate tensions about everyone having nukes: Ukraine, Belarus, and Pakistan. All three are consistent battlegrounds of the global northern empires now. the nuclear countries have demonstrated, it seems, to the global south that the adults table at the UN is who has nukes and if you get nukes and give them up, you wi...

While I agree broadly with what you said, Pakistan has kept their nukes, and is therefore quite independent. Belarus is also fine, since they're a Russian protectorate.

4
emergencyfood sh.itjust.works emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-07-03
#21 · Quote Reply

Does Iran even need a full fledged navy to keep the straight closed? The straight is narrow. A couple of gun boats and missiles launched from shore would be enough to keep most commercial shipping out.

They can attack ships with drones or even cannons. You don't even need to hit every ship. Even one in every ten will send insurance rates to the moon.

8
Bazell lemmy.zip Bazell@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-11-12
#22 · (edited) Quote Reply

One of the identifiers of fascism is that one's enemy is strong, needing to be stopped, and so weak they could never resist us.

This basically applies to not only the US and Israel, but also to what Russia does towards Ukraine.

5
Echo Dot feddit.uk echodot@feddit.uk
Joined: 2023-07-26
#23 · Quote Reply

It never occurred to me that the beef the US has with other countries having nukes is because it would put them on even footing. No nukes = no leverage.

Well yeah then they wouldn't be able to jack boot their way around the world causing problems.

Imagine how much better it would be if the US military had maybe 10% less funding and that money was spent on infrastructure or social services. Can't have that so they have to justify the massive military expense by having nearly constant wars. If no obvious conflict presents itself, invent one, and then lose.

3
m4xie lemmy.ca m4xie@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-09-30
#24 · (edited) Quote Reply

because Iran is weeks away from building the atomic bomb since 1995

That is kind of true though, but months rather than weeks.

The thing is, if a guy has a disassembled rifle on the table in front of him and you have a ready gun trained on him, he is minutes away from having a functional rifle but he will always remain so.

5
jenesaisquoi feddit.org jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
Joined: 2024-07-19
#25 · (edited) Quote Reply

One of the identifiers of fascism is that one's enemy is strong, needing to be stopped, and so weak they could never resist us.

Exactly. It's textbook nazi propaganda, where they said that the jews are a subhuman, degenerated race, but they also somehow insiduously control the entire world from the shadows. Like which is it now? Below or above typical intelligence and power? Both, in the world of the fascists.

2
ddplf szmer.info ddplf@szmer.info
Joined: 2024-08-08
#26 · Quote Reply

This basically applies to not only the US and Israel, but also to what Russia does towards Ukraine.

It applies everywhere there is a populist political agitation. The immigrants are parasitic freeloaders and they are here to steal your job!

1
adr1an programming.dev anzo@programming.dev
Joined: 2023-06-22
#27 · Quote Reply

I found it "interesting" that this happened when people were taking over the streets of Tehran so fiercely

2
Post Reply
Back to top