| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Linux and Tech News |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Leo
lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showJoined: 2023-06-13 |
|
||
| 59 Original | |||
Cris_Citrus (he/him <3)
piefed.zip
Cris_Citrus@piefed.zipJoined: 2026-02-26 |
Wow... I really wasn't expecting that to actually happen when that idea was floated. Even if that amendment sticks I'd rather it not happen all together |
||
| 12 | |||
Strit
Moderator
Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showJoined: 2023-08-24 |
My biggest concern with such an approach, is that companies will be more likely to choose a not completely open source licens, just to get around this. Like a code-available licens and argue that it counts as open source and should therefore be excluded. |
||
| 4 | |||
|
Onomatopoeia
lemmy.cafe
Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe Joined: 2025-01-02 |
Wow... I really wasn't expecting that to actually happen when that idea was floated. Even if that amendment sticks I'd rather it not happen all together
I would question the bill promotors as to why open source is exempt. And then turn their arguments back onto closed source. |
||
| 1 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |