RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Federal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
ArmchairAce1944 discuss.online ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
Joined: 2025-07-02
Quote

I can't. I just can't.

203   Original
TurboWafflz lemmy.world turbowafflz@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-09-23
#2 · Quote Reply

the reasons i want to get a motorcycle just keep adding up. everything about cars keeps getting ruined

30
blindbunny lemmy.ml blindbunny@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2021-06-14
#3 · Quote Reply

the reasons i want to get a motorcycle just keep adding up. everything about cars keeps getting ruined

Dooo it! DRZ DRZ!

6
a_gee_dizzle lemmy.ca a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-10-27
#4 · Quote Reply

This is so dystopian

62
Steve communick.news Steve@communick.news
Joined: 2023-08-05
#5 · Quote Reply

The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually.

What happens when it doesn't. Is their a provision to end the program if it doesnt make certain targeted goals? No? Of course not! That would be data driven legislation.

41
Lenins cat lemmy.ml Comrade_cat@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2026-04-20
#6 · Quote Reply

Modern are having our right of repair taken away to not just spyware.

1998 Toyota Carola for the win, easy to fix, and no spyware, and just works.

25
IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet reddthat.com IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
Joined: 2026-01-25
#7 · Quote Reply

This is so dystopian

It was game over for humanity decades ago.

10
QuinnyCoded sh.itjust.works QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-09-14
#8 · Quote Reply

yesterday on a police chase livestream on YouTube the cops tried to shut down a car that was running from them by calling the company. They got a spike strip before they could get it worked out but even hearing that it's an option is absolutely dystopian

here's the vod btw
https://www.youtube.com/live/-d9lHib8FJM

67
ThomasWilliams lemmy.world ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-12-10
#9 · Quote Reply

Already exist in Australia and these systems are total garbage that keep warning non stop.

11
GMac feddit.org GMac@feddit.org
Joined: 2026-01-09
#10 · Quote Reply

"If the AI determines you’re impaired (blood alcohol ≥0.08% or showing fatigue), it can prevent ignition startup or limit vehicle speed"

So if I the driver is injured, or distraught over an injured passenger, the car will limit how fast they can get to a hospital?

Reckon this needs a little more time in the thinking through phase of the process.

30
FineCoatMummy sh.itjust.works FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-02-17
#11 · Quote Reply

yesterday on a police chase livestream on YouTube the cops tried to shut down a car that was running from them by calling the company. They got a spike strip before they could get it worked out but even hearing that it's an option is absolutely dystopian here's the vod btw https://www.youtube.com/live/-d9lHib8FJM

is absolutely dystopian

Esp because they could already use, you know... a spike strip!

It feels kinda like targeted v dragnet surviilance debate. Targeted feels OK if you get a warrant from a judge, use the legal procedures. But dragnet makes for a dystopia. Similar here. I don't want a global ability for some centralized db to flip a bit and stop any body's car across the world. Or, worst case, hacked and stops EVERYBODYs car at once.

17
I_Has_A_Hat lemmy.world I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-01-24
#12 · Quote Reply

The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually. What happens when it doesn't. Is their a provision to end the program if it doesnt make certain targeted goals? No? Of course not! That would be data driven legislation.

That's also a pathetically low number given the size of the population.

In the US alone, over 3 million people die every year. That means even by their most wildly optimistic, straight-from-the-ass estimates, it will only reduce deaths by 0.3%.

Does that sound worth it to you to give up your freedom?

12
sqgl sh.itjust.works sqgl@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-06-11
#13 · (edited) Quote Reply

Already exist in Australia and these systems are total garbage that keep warning non stop.

Not exactly true.

They do not monitor the face of the driver and they are only mandatory for coaches and long distance freight.

https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/roads-safety-and-rules/heavy-vehicles/vehicle-monitors

3
Jentu lemmy.ml Jentu@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2024-10-27
#14 · Quote Reply

yesterday on a police chase livestream on YouTube the cops tried to shut down a car that was running from them by calling the company. They got a spike strip before they could get it worked out but even hearing that it's an option is absolutely dystopian here's the vod btw https://www.youtube.com/live/-d9lHib8FJM

Hasn’t GM OnStar vehicles had this tech since 2009?

10
octobob lemmy.ml octobob@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2023-06-01
#15 · Quote Reply

Modern are having our right of repair taken away to not just spyware. 1998 Toyota Carola for the win, easy to fix, and no spyware, and just works.

I live in Pittsburgh. They don't call it the rust belt for no reason. If you go to a junkyard you'll see tons of perfectly working old Toyotas and Hondas as far as the engine and things go, but they're all rusted out to the point of not being worth the repairs. This part of the country sucks for owning any car. Tons of potholes, snow, ice, salt, etc. A lot of roads are just fucked in this state. Can't even avoid the potholes when your whole car's suspension rumbles down the road the whole time. Highways are a little better but not much. There's plenty of uneven roads on them too.

Sucks tryin to stick to older cars considering all this. Unless you get something out of state I guess

4
QuinnyCoded sh.itjust.works QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-09-14
#16 · Quote Reply

Hasn’t GM OnStar vehicles had this tech since 2009?

i wouldn't know, I was 2 years old in 2019 lol

4
JustEnoughDucks slrpnk.net JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
Joined: 2026-03-10
#17 · Quote Reply

i wouldn't know, I was 2 years old in 2019 lol

Best typo! Hello fellow 7 year old!

8
BrickEater lemmy.world BrickEater@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-12-30
#18 · Quote Reply

Even more of a reason to keep my cars from the 80s

12
QuinnyCoded sh.itjust.works QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-09-14
#19 · Quote Reply

Best typo! Hello fellow 7 year old!

damn it, my habit of typing while walking strikes again!

2
ThomasWilliams lemmy.world ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-12-10
#20 · Quote Reply

Not exactly true. They do not monitor the face of the driver and they are only mandatory for coaches and long distance freight. https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/roads-safety-and-rules/heavy-vehicles/vehicle-monitors

No.

They monitor the face of the driver and they are mandatory for all vehicles

-1
sqgl sh.itjust.works sqgl@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2025-06-11
#21 · Quote Reply

No. They monitor the face of the driver and they are mandatory for all vehicles

Which state? It doesn't seem to be the case in NSW according to that web page.

2
ScoffingLizard lemmy.dbzer0.com ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-05-04
#22 · Quote Reply

Already exist in Australia and these systems are total garbage that keep warning non stop.

Can you disable them? Do they have false positives frequently?

2
ScoffingLizard lemmy.dbzer0.com ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-05-04
#23 · Quote Reply

It was game over for humanity decades ago.

Obviously, people should keep having babies.

5
fuzzzerd programming.dev fuzzzerd@programming.dev
Joined: 2023-07-31
#24 · Quote Reply

That's also a pathetically low number given the size of the population. In the US alone, over 3 million people die every year. That means even by their most wildly optimistic, straight-from-the-ass estimates, it will only reduce deaths by 0.3%. Does that sound worth it to you to give up your freedom?

That's not how many car deaths per year, in the us it is in the 40,000 range for the last several years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_fatality_rate_in_U.S._by_year

Not sure where three million came from.

5
Eugene V. Debs' Ghost lemmy.dbzer0.com eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2024-10-10
#25 · Quote Reply

Obviously, people should keep having babies.

More babies means more victims of water wars, climate Holocaust, and obedient serfs.

I personally got my tubes tied. I didn't get asked to live in a dystopia.

5
WoodScientist lemmy.world WoodScientist@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-09-06
#26 · Quote Reply

is absolutely dystopian Esp because they could already use, you know... a spike strip! It feels kinda like targeted v dragnet surviilance debate. Targeted feels OK if you get a warrant from a judge, use the legal procedures. But dragnet makes for a dystopia. Similar here. I don't want a global ability for some centralized db to flip a bit and stop any body's car across the world. Or, worst case...

Or, worst case, hacked and stops EVERYBODYs car at once.

I've always envisioned this scenario a little more absurd. I always imagined a hacker hacking a city full of autonomous vehicles and commanding them all to drive to a single tiny cul-de-sac. Imagine the traffic jam when a million cars all try to drive to the same tiny suburban side street all at once.

2
ScoffingLizard lemmy.dbzer0.com ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-05-04
#27 · Quote Reply

More babies means more victims of water wars, climate Holocaust, and obedient serfs. I personally got my tubes tied. I didn't get asked to live in a dystopia.

I'm so glad to hear from at least one reasonable person today. Thanks for that. Everyone lack of awareness is driving me nuts.

3
Eugene V. Debs' Ghost lemmy.dbzer0.com eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2024-10-10
#28 · (edited) Quote Reply

I'm so glad to hear from at least one reasonable person today. Thanks for that. Everyone lack of awareness is driving me nuts.

It sucks being the only one in your group being aware of situations, and being ignored until shit hits the fan.

And you can't really go "I was right the entire time, and you were wrong the entire time" because it doesn't solve anything. You just gotta deal with the fact people could be doing better if they paid attention when you brought it up.

I've lost count how many times it's happened. It feels like Cassandra from greek legends, or a reverse boy who cried wolf.

1
ScoffingLizard lemmy.dbzer0.com ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Joined: 2025-05-04
#29 · Quote Reply

It sucks being the only one in your group being aware of situations, and being ignored until shit hits the fan. And you can't really go "I was right the entire time, and you were wrong the entire time" because it doesn't solve anything. You just gotta deal with the fact people could be doing better if they paid attention when you brought it up. I've lost count how many times it's happened. It f...

Same here. I said Facebook was just to spy on people for the government in 2008. Everyone thought I was nuts. Now it's common knowledge. It might have started off one way, but it ended that way.

The privacy issue is what is driving me nuts now. I have done everything to convince friends to get off google, amazon, etc, suggested alternatives, talked to them about consequences, but it's like talking to brick walls. Been saying it for years.

All day I just tell people to stop doing bad shit and they just do it anyway. By the time they realize it, it's too late.

2
Post Reply
Back to top