RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
Forty years on from the disaster, why there are foxes, bears and bison again around Chernobyl
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
solo piefed.social solo@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-07
Quote

Studies indicate that the lack of human hunting, agriculture and development has a more positive impact on animal numbers than radiation has a negative one.

41   Original
Daysofcoleco lemmy.world Daysofcoleco@lemmy.world
Joined: 2026-04-21
#2 · Quote Reply

We're worse than radiation.

13
givesomefucks lemmy.world givesomefucks@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-30
#3 · Quote Reply

Well, yeah...

Wild animals don't survive to old age, they survive until they can't escape predator and/or can't catch prey.

They die from something else besides radiation, but any mutations that mitigate the damage will quickly spread. With the absence of humans, it doesn't take much until the radiation just isn't a big deal comparitovely

9
solo piefed.social solo@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-07
#4 · Quote Reply

We're worse than radiation.

The way I see things, we/humans are not the problem. The system that is currently dominant is. Meaning systems change and even tho those in power try to make us think otherwise.

For example, in the past many people believed that it's impossible to have "proper" societies without a king. Time proved them wrong.

2
foodandart lemmy.zip foodandart@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-10-07
#5 · (edited) Quote Reply

Well, yeah... Wild animals don't survive to old age, they survive until they can't escape predator and/or can't catch prey. They die from something else besides radiation, but any mutations that mitigate the damage will quickly spread. With the absence of humans, it doesn't take much until the radiation just isn't a big deal comparitovely

Yup. Radiation's a much more pesky problem when you have an 80 year long lifespan. 10 to 15 years? (if that) Not so much.

7
prettybunnys piefed.social prettybunnys@piefed.social
Joined: 2025-06-10
#6 · Quote Reply

The way I see things, we/humans are not the problem. The system that is currently dominant is. Meaning systems change and even tho those in power try to make us think otherwise. For example, in the past many people believed that it's impossible to have "proper" societies without a king. Time proved them wrong.

We’re not the only species that acts how we do, we’re just the only worldwide species with the level of impact.

We’re like locusts.

4
flora_explora beehaw.org flora_explora@beehaw.org
Joined: 2023-06-11
#7 · Quote Reply

Great read, thanks for sharing!

2
Post Reply
Back to top