Link: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-30/tense-exchanges-federal-court-case-accc-woolworths/106561702

There have been tense exchanges in the Federal Court, with the judge overseeing the bombshell case between the ACCC and Woolworths questioning the consumer watchdog's case.

I guess even supermarkets need a pet.

Hmmm, did they ever accidentally chargw less?

This judge has demonstrated some questionable reasoning with these comments.

This judge sounds dumb as fuck. That's not a matter of fact, and just opinion, so you can sue me, you absolute fuckhead.

This is proof that the ACCC is a paper tiger who can't actually protect consumer rights. Because the courts are just very heavily favoured to moneyed interests.

This is just one case in a long, long list of cases that end up this way.

The law just gets ignored.