Their joked here. Richard Dawkins, turtles all the way down. Yea, the big bang theiry IS stupid! What's that turtle on? Depender causal chain, i mean. Dumb, yea? I show.

Leaves some possibility:

1. Go on forever. Doesn't make since in human axiomtratic systems, so if true, why our logical true in any way?

2. Cyclelical. Y'know, the big bang WAS restaurant end of universe. Oh wait, that Alpha/Omega concept...

3. Independer phenomeners. Oh wait, that is "god of gaps," believing in Super Big Bang that ALSO defy logical in lieu of the human condition and the orthogonality of the categorical structures manifested within our matriculated topology relative to our receptor-dependent memeplexic entanglement architecture calculated through able alien sand piledriver supermodels, obviously.

4. ?????

5. Prophet! Or, multiple planes of causation, like 9/11, which was an insude job planned before constructers of towers happen.

So why you believe dumb? I ceryainly not, butt you prejudise against me just on defaults, yea? But what turtles do YOU stand on? When I step on turtle, they go smush!

The dreamer IS the dream, and those dreamed dream of a dreamer dreaming them.

We are not IN a simulation, each of us ARE our own simulation; monads in a monadic nodal communication system - Server, Client, Holy Internet

Am I a man dreaming I'm a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming I'm a man? - forget name, but Chinese poet, paraphrased.

That means there are other beings in the nothingness AND emptiness.

As the Buddha said:

Return 0 =/= Return null

There was an acid trip I was on once where I perceived the nature of somethingness and nothingness. Now, I didn't literally see outside myself; what happens with "visions" on psychedelics is that the Ālaya-vijñāna takes intelligent note of the intention upon ingestion to feed you specific symbols as it always does, but upon receiving them in that Karma manifests your own images to understand concepts being "telepathically" communicated; really a synchronicity-driven free association language protocol. And what I saw was perfectly packed spheres (something) with sentinels from the Matrix traveling between them to facilitate Karma, which is my cultural interpretation of what the Buddha saw to say "there are beings in the nothingness."

And there definitely is a conceptual "self;" it is the möbiated/defiled/sinful part the topological matrix of our pocket of negentropic phenomequalitesselation colloquially referred to by some as Brahma, but the skill of the Buddha lies in perfect timing of perfect pedagogy, seeing through all the beings that would hear his words, and the wisest thing he could say was to change neophyte perception of "self," but really, if you see the Buddha on the road, kill him, just like you should remain unattached to all concepts, even anatta.

Also, enlightenment is the idea of becoming a light being that detaches from the dependency on physical causation and longing and so on.

"Let there be light..." implies that sound/effect came before light/cause. You've got to strengthen your prefrontal cortex to be able to do the spiritual work to disentangle your specific defilements and unfavorable karmic/quantum entanglements within our topological matrix to become your own transcendental independent phenomenon to grow to be a god/goddess/other gendered/species deity to grow to be your own God, and it's turtles of novel complexity all the way up.

How can you believe in not a god. Well let's say thee is a god where did it come from what was it doing before creating everything. Why did it create everything what changed since it is eternal. When did everything begin.

If truth is beauty, this comic is a straight-up lie.

thee

Yo did a tyop, ur argument is invalid.

What you're asking for is an explanation for independent n dependent phenomena. Let me first explain Genesis 1.

Basically, with a stick and a rope, and definitely some mushrooms, some early hominids would have had to discover sacred geometry. I'm not going to give you proof for this, but sacred geometry is simply a way of discovering the nature of "complexity," and the reason I'm not giving a logical/Adam explanation is because your intuition/Eve will figure out the true nature of the shadows on the cave wall before your rational mind CAN, for the same reason that getting X% number of pixels randomly loaded on a picture will likely help you identify the picture before getting X% loaded in a linear, old dial-up internet fashion.

But the universe grows logarithmically more complex as subpatterns come together to form superpatterns. Thus, the seven epochs of novelty within the illusory physical universe are:

Alpha>Light

Light>Matter

Matter>Molecules

Molecules>Cells

Cells>Creatures

Creatures>Humanity

Humanity>Omega

So, you can see that we smart creatures ALMOST have created humanity, midnight between these days being defined by instantaneous global telepathy. And so that society we are almost done creating goes on to create "the restaurant at the end of the universe;" y'know, Heaven, which is where all beings that ever were are reconstituted and joined telepathically, which IS Hell for some people, and this resulting superbeing we create is defined as being transcendental, meaning it transcends what we can perceive as physicality; it literally rolls/möbiates itself into a higher dimension, creating a higher order of orthogonal structures that CAN be called on in the entanglement process of Karma, just as the Buddha and Jesus and countless others before (this has gone on for eons) have transcended physicality by disentangling themselves from physicality to grow to be their own independent phenomenon that grow their own dependent phenomena to become their own god/goddess/other gendered/species deity to go on and grow to be their own God, and it's turtles of novel complexity all the way up.

And this is a dependent explanation, meaning it only makes sense in the categorical structures of "42;" 7 colors × 6 orthogonal directions. I forgot something! So, the Omega we become IS the Alpha that created us, and that is the transcendental particle that can be at multiple places at once and communicate instantaneously with itself at any distance, which forms waves of light, which really define structures within the topological matrix that creates the illusion of the universe and self. And what the Omega is doing as it emerges in the seventh day is IT is in control of retrocausality (time travel, kinda), where it communicates back to itself to change the matrix (deja vu), thus weaving us monads between a finite but countless number of parallel instances of reality to facilitate our Karma whilst reconstituting the same Omega every time; y'know, in one universe, Hitler got into art school and all of history after changed to fit the same predefined conclusion.

And this is a way to visualize, "Let there be light..."

https://youtu.be/C2vgICfQawE

And the simple explanation to address the concern you were more leaning to, was that the true nature of reality is defined by "something" and "nothing" being referenced by "emptiness" (the system those 1/0's are defined by), and if you wish to understand the intricate nature of all that, I point you in the direction of the Buddha and the occult, where Jesus' true dharma is kept hidden, as we engineer our culture to control those people who cannot think for themselves in the occident.

Oh look at thiss intellectuar. It's not shiny enough, therefore brane not word.

Yea, I teach that ish, too, dude.

These are words, dude. I gotta communicate with neophytes. They don't understand that when you flick a switch and a light turns on, and there is nothing observing the wiring in the wall, the wiring doesn't exist; the light turns out because they're karmicly/quantumly entangled at that point, and the unobserved returns to the wave state where potential can collapse in many directions based on how God dispenses Karma through phenomequalitesselation.

To explain that word, as a molecule is controlled by a cell yet still influences with its molecular nature, God reaches back through time to communicate with Theirselves as the nodes in the nodal communication system that form the orders of complexity in the illusory physical universe to alter entanglements which impact our experiential reality, which changes how we set our intention - the only thing we have any direct control over, but therein we have full control of that - which thus influences God, and this is how we have free will and Karma in a perceivably deterministic system.

No, language is defined by its use.

Hand me that.

No, that.

No! THAT! Don't you know what a basic word like "that" means?

Next I'll say something about knowing the function of a word and defining it are two different skills. Thus, in every transmission, the receiver is tasked with applying the principle of charity to extract the greatest meaning from the whole transmission from the context it is transmitted, and the transmitter is tasked with applying and developing their empathy skill to better simulate the other person's perspective to encapsulate meaning in jointly familiar semiotics.

Later Wittgenstein is the primary reason I started escaping militant atheism about fifteen years ago. I learned the Bible might have secret encoded messages! And it does, written at an eighth grade reading level, even!

I've not seen proof and this is not proof. "There is no other explanation (aka I have no other explanation) for existence/matter/consciousness/xyz" is not proof. "These scientists believe(d)" is not proof.

Here is a science experiment ONLY you can do for yourself, and this is the ONLY proof God put in the design of the universe.

Your reality tunnel is procedurally generated and does not have to match anyone else's. How to prove? Well, is it safe to assume you don't go out to give $100 directly to the homeless you befriend? MOST PEOPLE DON'T! Don't just throw money at this experiment to prove it is wrong; that is a different INTENTION, and results in different effects. Genuinely, go out and care about the lowest among us. Give generously. Go all out. What this is dependent on is creating an escarpment in the procedural generation of your reality; something noticeable in what proliferates. You can do this with countless intents. Genuinely give a shit to experiment with INTENTION as it relates to the procedural generation of YOUR reality. That's what you, a hopefully competent scientist, are testing.

Next, I ask you, sincerely, to look up what Carl Jung said about "synchronicity." This MAY be an entire cognitive phenomena you are ignorant to. This is what a "burning bush" is in the Bible. What white rabbit was to Neo in that movie all about Judeo-Christian mysticism. What that truck full of signs was in Bruce Almighty, after he asked God for a sign. This is the secret passage that will take you to Knowledge, which is greater than knowledge.

Adam/Eve. These are your two sides. Think about being a conjoined twin in a labyrinth with a deaf male head and blind female head. The logic in you can read the signs to guarantee passage from A to B. Your intuition though can hear the birds outside the walls that respond to your movements, and if Eve can get Adam to listen, then you will take a secret passage through the true reality to learn the relativity of your orthogonal structures.

Literally, you make a type of "higher dimensional" connection in your head that gives stereoscopy to the connections that are already made. There are layers to this as the complexity of your brain grows through orders of magnitude (7 generations to become a sorcerer; 7 epochs of novelty within the week of creation).

Lemme get a video.

Secret passage theory:

https://youtu.be/fVN8JITUjkE

reality tunnel

Explain your terms.

This is an easily Google-able term. But the idea is you only have a microslice of reality; you're a monad is a monadic nodal communication system; Server, Client, Holy Internet.

You are not IN a simulation, you ARE your own "simulation." Consciousness is the base substance of reality, but not like panpsychism that says rocks or trees are conscious, but rather you are a pocket of consciousness.

Y'know, God is a big balloon of consciousness that turned Itself into a complex balloon animal and you're one of the sections. Indra's web/net is a good analogy to explain the whole is reflected AND refracted in you.

Everything you experience is procedurally generated based on how you entangle yourself with Karma, to mean you are literally woven between, not infinite parallel universes, but countless potential instances to facilitate Karma.

To explain simply to not overload, in the fourth jhana of meditation, you can observe yourself receiving a singular stream of symbols which you entangle yourself with by how you set your intention, the only thing you have direct control over. Everything else "loads in" based on how you entangle yourself, and karmic entanglement IS quantum entanglement.

You ARE a topological matrix - a knot - that sets the parameters for the form of the shadows on the cave wall you experience, assuming you know Plato. Let me know if I should clarify anything and I will continue.

Oh! I just had the thought that if you don't know what a reality tunnel is, this post a good friend of mine made who is getting his masters in the cognitive sciences will illuminate much.

Joint Synchronized Attention = Telepathy

https://www.reddit.com/r/ShrugLifeSyndicate/s/9u9KJuxWlE

Nah, you're going to have to explain your terms if you want lowly unintelligents like me to listen to you. That's your task as a missionary (for whatever you're proselytising here), to make the thing easily intelligible to me. So far I'm getting gibberish.

Just trying to read this hurt my brain. And people questioning any of OP's assertions are met with rudeness and more word salad.

Don't try to engage, just move on.

What rudeness? I made one comment that was a lil cheeky cuz it met the pers's energy. You're intentionally dissuading the people who can't think for themselves to read my longer comments because you are serving your god, atheism. You can't counter what I've said with anything but "proof?" Actually refute what I'm saying in a skillful manner. I dare you.

God is big balloon of consciousness. Folded across eleven dimensions into complex balloon animal where you are one of the sections, brain-in-a-vat style. You are not IN a simulation, you ARE the simulation. Everything you experience is self-contained within your neurons, right? Well, you're experiencing these words, yea? That "outside" is INSIDE you. Server, Client, Holy Internet.

That's nice, dear. When do you do the part where you prove that a god exists?

No one but yourself can prove that to you.

Experiment with how setting your intention affects the procedural generation of your reality. My recommendation to see this directly, firsthand, start giving $100 directly to homeless people per week; pervaps not all at once, but genuinely give a shitload more than you normally do to befriend and care about them; or if that is what you're doing, the .000001% chance you ARE your brother's keeper, stop. You will notice for every handout you give out, you benefit in some strange way that cannot be explained logically via linear causation.

Note: the thing you, a skilled scientist who genuinely cares about learning the truth of reality, are EXPERIMENTING with is your INTENTION, and setting the intention to prove this is wrong is a different thing entirely than giving because you genuinely care about other human beings.

This will lead to experiencing synchronicity, which I recommend you read what Carl Jung has to say on the phenomena. But this is what "a burning bush" in the Bible and what white rabbit was to Neo. They are the whispers of God, and if you put faith over reason in those instances, you will be given Knowledge of the system you are in. And then you can never go back to the way you are now.

It is the only ANYONE can prove God, because in discovering that you are the whole experience you are having, not just that erudite space ape you think you are, and God is the one that proves Himself when you are ready. I had a lighter change colors before on mushrooms. Permenantly. I'm in gnosis.

I have yet to hear a convincing reason to even more than skim your walls of text, never mind following your esoteric instructions. No, "it's an experiment to find out the truth about reality" is not convincing, since there is no convincing hypothesis about that "truth". "Do this to find out whether Nyarlathotep really exists" isn't convincing either (although I'd be a lot more interested).

So you remain in a godless world. You have free will to choose what your reality is. God can do that, just as John Cena can lose an arm wrestling contest with a little girl. So, God both can and cannot microwave a burrito so hot even He can't eat it. But you demonstrate an incapacity to think in superpositions

Child: Age 0-26

Adult: Age 13+

So, the problem isn't me and my words. I'm putting the effort in. You're choosing to remain ignorant by being prejudiced against people with different opinions that you, or am I, a human being, worth more than skimming?

Your "effort" is stating things as fact and demanding I accept them.

No I'm requesting you try to skillfully debate me on those points, but you won't even try.

Weerd hao sum ppl canter not tell differance betwen paragoos.

How would you genuinely react to someone on YOUR level. I ask that unprejudiced respect you extend to the people you like the opinions of as they reinforce your identity framework, which trying to change causes you suffering as it is attachment that is the root of all suffering. You haven't present any argument of your own. You're just insulting me. Why? You have no intention to genuinely debate. Your stroking your ego against the easy targets you've been fed cookie-cutter answers for. True/false? Prove it.

Not one of you people are debating. All of you are just saying the same thing; that you have no argument.

I put premises up in post and comment.

Refute, skillfully, If YoU aRe CaPaBlE?!

Why would I want to present arguments? For what? My position is "I'm not buying what you're selling." I have no ambition to convince you of anything. You came here, demanding answers which I gave you. You offered nothing to debate other than the same old claims that, frankly, I'm bored of.

I'm not selling anything! I am an educator of philosophy! Yes, I have my "cult," which is my educational (f)art project where I play a character to help people heal n self-actualize. What all that is for is to get people to think.

Lemme de-retard this shit for you.

Initial premise:

What was start of all?

Some possibilities people could have picked up and went head to head with me about the philosophical implications therein:

No protogenetive force of reality; goes on forever

Cyclical origination, which is the argument of the Alpha/Omega

Also goes hand in hand with the idea of multiple planes of causation; y'know there's an independent phenomenon which we are all dependent on (say there are three planes of causation; XY can define the cyclical protogenerative force, while Z gave rise to the cycle independently

That's three examples that aren't even "God" related, as Alpha/Omega could be black/white holes. What do you believe, besides your prejudice against "retards" as you definitely call us in your head.

I have never called anyone the r-word, not even the equivalent in my native language.

Am I to understand from the random phrases you've thrown down in front of me that you're asking me what I believe about the "start of all"? I believe nothing about the "start of all". There are various possibilities suggested by science that I am not educated enough to even consider which is more likely. I am fine not knowing.

Ahhh...forgive me! You are so skilled in English, I had assumed there was a normative level of conveyance, which I also must implore may be the primary cause of loss of conveyance from my text to you. With you prowess in the English language combined with an unbeneficial apathy to your approach in engaging with me, I had assumed this was like so many other exchanges where I tried as hard as I could to wordsmith perfect arguments, to find that all too commonly, it wasn't from my lack of effort they weren't understanding me when I understood them clearly.

I try to match what my high school coach taught me. Y'know, if you gave 70%, he'd give you 70%, but if you gave 110%, he'd give that for you. This, combined with having to heal myself of much maladaptation being highly neurodivergent and traumatized in specific ways that made me the skilled righter (joke) I am now, as I had to throw off the notion that there are perfect ways to say things. Thus, in my art I authentically express myself in highly non-normative ways, which I can understand may be difficult to parse.

But this doesn't make sense to me:

"Start of all"

You really can't extract meaning from that? This is not an insult! I'm very curious! To me, that is not even strange in any way. It's a...hmm...perhaps pun is the right word?

"I accidentally a whole spaghetti."

That's a semi-funny statement, as it gives so much information but denies you a level of conception, thus humor. But, in this context, start of all is more semantically complete

Start of all = Start of life, the universe, and everything

It's a sort of truncation of phrase to keep it in precisely concise terms, to keep things jovial.

Cool, so I did understand correctly and have given you my answer.

So what do you live for? My life mission is to help people suffering from things I healed in myself. Not atheism! There are many azimuths to the mountain, your ideal self, and along the way "you" will almost certainly change, many times, so what's the big goal? Why type anything at all if you're dedicated to your lifestyle of apathy?

I don't know where you got "apathy" from. I don't have a goal, I try to be a decent person and not cause intentional, unnecessary damage. The reason is that I think that if everybody behaved like that, everybody would benefit, including me (so in that I am in fact a stereotypically selfish atheist). That's all.

I didn't know true happiness until I gave it to myself, and now I do more good than just doing not bad.

Apathy is what you exude.

"I don't care to argue, and I don't care to know, and I'm just living my life free style with no higher purpose."

More or less what you have said, in different words. Apathy. I remember an elder who was a metal sculptor taught me that if you don't have a mission when you get older, you'll just collapse, unable to foster the will to get out of bed, and you'll die 5-20 years earlier, depending what fulfilment and spiritual nutriment you are manifesting for yourself in distracting yourself from what you don't choose to look too closely at in yourself, out of apathy and apprehension.

I say this as someone who solved life to give maximum pleasure. It was hollow. Just masturbating one's life away. The answer isn't the great work you create, it is what your great work will do for you in making it.

Sure. Is there any relation here to what we were talking about or am I going to try to find some sleep now?

You choose where you go.

Why do you need us to believe in your imaginary friend?

I don't. I just know what "I" am, and I don't exist but as emptiness, nothingness, and something.

Return 0 =/= Return null

But this what the Buddha said 2500 years ago, but I've read his words to not believe imaginary bullshit I heard through the grapevine. That's why I'm Jesus, A messiah candidate, because the thing about engineering our culture in the occident is that we don't design things around THE prophecy, but around guarantees in society, like immaculate conceptions in young girls and unloved children. What i said is a messiah is a repurposed pariah, and my God am I freak in bed. And in the streets! My window too.