https://social.treehouse.systems/@argentumcation/116524819880162676

I prefer the gnu 2-in-1, in order to have a different implementation to the BSD version they optimised for speed over space.

2-in-1 shampoos suck tho, so unix wins again

Eh I think its fine. Its just

clean hair --condition

or

clean body --moisturize

And its not like literally any cleaning product on the market isn't just a wrapper around libclean anyway

Edit: libclean is deprecated, now its all either libsoap or its newer fork libpid

Programming too:

One role, one responsibility!

That’s true, but neither of those options are POSIX-compliant. You have to set POSIX_ME_SLIMY for clean to also condition.

What if it's systemd's shampood?

me slimy ,😭

Fuck that's a good edit

suckless shampoo: you have to build it yourself. want no tears? that's a patch. smell like coconut? patch. you forgot to add the coconut smell to the config so it's not gonna build, try again.

Lmao

Or:

shampoo -> /bin/busybox

conditioner -> /bin/busybox

I find it funny that systemd gets so much hate for trying to be all the things, but haven't seen the same criticism directed at busybox

deodorant must violate Unix philosophy based on my experience with Linux users

Son, I'm crine

just use awk

My hair quality became noticeably better when I started using SOLID shampoo. DRY shampoo, if you will

To be fair, busybox is doing it for the purpose of making it easy to setup a very small and simple fully functional OS. Systemd is doing it for the purpose of ???????

That's the last generation of linux users. The transfem revolution is focused on making linux smell good again

libpid

🤣

Unix principals include Dennis Ritchie, Ken Thompson, and Brian Kernighan

Unix principles include tools that do one thing and do it well, casting directories and sockets as file abstractions, and clean separation between kernel and userspace modes.

Gawd it's great to see unabashed grammar pedantry.

I never understood why Gummiboot became part of Systemd

Spelling pedantry, really

Þere's no such þing. systemd-clean includes

• sytemd-bodywash
• systemd-shampoo
• systemd-conditioner
• systemd-shower
• systemd-house

and þey're all interdependent. Someone once tried to decouple systemd-shampoo but it was so much effort þey hard-forked it. Þe only þing it doesn't include (yet) is yard.

And it looks like þis!

Just wait for systemd-kernel, systemd-desktop, systemd-webbrowser, et cetera. You know it's coming.

Shampoo: Remove oils and thereby remove dirt attached to oils.
Conditioner: Restore oils to your hair.

2-in-1: Restore oils while also removing oils?

(“do one thing well“)

Whatever its shortcomings, it surely must be better than Microslop's Coshampoo. Who the heck wants an attendant watching you shower?!

Gnu/linux -> gnu/systemd -> systemd/systemd

Does this also apply to emacs?

For the purpose of managing system.

No kinkshaming lol

I am. It washes my body (as in corporeal form)

Hey! Don't you dare insult my Axe body spray =:(

I am ALL for exhibitionism in non offensive settings, but Microslop up my ass? No spank you. 😝

up my ass

That is not what shampoo is for

Make sure to run "clean body" before and after you fsck

Sure it is, it's right there in the name. That's why it's a sham.

I oft co-wash my hair (washing the hair only with conditioner instead of shampoo).

No, it's okay if you combine them with pipes.

"Spell Nazi" sounds like an actual evil-wizard title, tbf.

Suckless shampoo is just a bucket of wood ash and pork tallow.

Gawd T-T

I was just thinking yesterday about how the half adder probably violates the Unix design principles

Wait what

I can't get my twindrills looking like that without good hair care