| Post Reply | RetroFed Forum Forum Index » Hardware |
| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Rekall Incorporated
piefed.social
Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
TSMC backs renewables during record demand for energy-hungry chip manufacturing. |
||
| 24 Original | |||
tal
lemmy.today
tal@lemmy.todayJoined: 2023-10-04 |
I remember reading, a while back, that something like 15% of Taiwan's total electrical power usage goes to chip fabs. What I read was saying that TSMC probably has a ton of room for electricity optimization, but it's just not worth it. Like, what I was reading was talking about how they never shut off machines, even if they aren't making chips, because just introducing temperature variations is enough to add more variables that might screw up yield rates. |
||
| 7 | |||
|
JelleWho
lemmy.world
JelleWho@lemmy.world Joined: 2024-10-20 |
I remember reading, a while back, that something like 15% of Taiwan's total electrical power usage goes to chip fabs. What I read was saying that TSMC probably has a ton of room for electricity optimization, but it's just not worth it. Like, what I was reading was talking about how they never shut off machines, even if they aren't making chips, because just introducing temperature variations is...
I work at a big global size production company. And I can confirm that this is not them. If the cost of the extra startup time/waste/hassle is bigger than the idle time. Companies will just consume more power. This is not just TSMC |
||
| 1 | |||
Rekall Incorporated
Moderator
Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.socialJoined: 2025-06-08 |
I remember reading, a while back, that something like 15% of Taiwan's total electrical power usage goes to chip fabs. What I read was saying that TSMC probably has a ton of room for electricity optimization, but it's just not worth it. Like, what I was reading was talking about how they never shut off machines, even if they aren't making chips, because just introducing temperature variations is...
IRL cyberpunk |
||
| 2 | |||
| Post Reply |
Back to top |