RetroFed Forum
Your home away from modern life.
This App Warns You if Someone Is Wearing Smart Glasses Nearby - 404media
Post Reply
AuthorMessage
LePoisson lemmy.world LePoisson@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-02
#202 · Quote Reply

"Here's a list of reasons why all hope is lost and you too should bend the knee." That's all I read. C.O.W.A.R.D.

You're a silly person, aren't ya.

Yeah fuck me for acknowledging AR glasses or other AR tech could be very useful but it's being limited by our privacy concerns that are basically theater at this point.

Truly I am so cowardly Mr big internet man.

0
pemptago lemmy.ml pemptago@lemmy.ml
Joined: 2024-08-11
#203 · Quote Reply

There's a window of attention for public discourse and there's fatigue. We, as a group, can only be upset about so much. It's a tried tactic to just try to distract us with some crazy shit, like Trump did with the alien files. If one crazy thing comes up in the news, other stuff will drop from our radar. And that's why people try shit again and again and again. Always in the hope that this time...

Windows Recall has re-entered the chat.

2
kent_eh lemmy.ca kent_eh@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-06
#204 · (edited) Quote Reply

[deleted]

would these help lead to more arrest if assaults were captured on the cameras

It might also help find lost puppies, but that's not a good enough reason to give up any additional amounts of privacy to the megacorporations or to a police state.

4
kent_eh lemmy.ca kent_eh@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-06
#205 · Quote Reply

Years of privacy violations going deeper and deeper under pretend of "progress" and "pRoTeCt the cHiLdReN". I am glad that people started rebelling against Flock, and some removed their Amazon cameras following the Superbowl's ads, but that's not even close to how much we should be mad at these mass surveillance actors.

Years of privacy violations going deeper and deeper under pretend of "progress" and "pRoTeCt the cHiLdReN".

https://imgur.com/QqabC7T

2
dariusj18 lemmy.world dariusj18@lemmy.world
Joined: 2024-01-21
#206 · Quote Reply

now if i could get that app without a phone, and with a warning of nearby phones too...

Prolly use a Flipper Zero

5
HalfSalesman lemmy.world HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-30
#207 · Quote Reply

It apparently works with the bluetooth signals which I found really smart.

Couldn't people who specifically want to stealthily record people just turn off the bluetooth?

1
HalfSalesman lemmy.world HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
Joined: 2025-06-30
#208 · Quote Reply

I mean, eventually there are going to be people with camera's stealthily integrated directly into their eyeballs recording non-stop.

Like that black mirror episode letting people relive any moment from their past.

10
SkyeStarfall lemmy.blahaj.zone SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2023-06-12
#209 · Quote Reply

I'm just being realistic about the future. You already are carrying around a machine that's listening and watching. You're walking into and out of stores where you're on camera. Hell you're driving past however many cameras in your car or walking past them on the street, every business, every office, every space has cameras now. Thus, I think eventually more and more augmented reality devices w...

While I agree that AR glasses will become widespread, there's still time to advocate for and implement privacy focused regulations. Especially early on as people are upset about the technology

While not perfect solutions, enforcing stuff such as recording LEDs and such are steps in the right direction

4
Donkter lemmy.world Donkter@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-01
#210 · Quote Reply

I agree with the core of your point. I'd like to assert, though, that all people exert some level of self-censorship in public on the basis of the opinions of their neighbors and peers. Having to worry about powerful organizations like governments and megacorps also always being there (instead of just sometimes, or usually) adds a new degree of reason to self-censor, for sure.

Yes. You should have to censor yourself for neighbors and peers to have a functioning society. You should not have to do it for corporations. The line is pretty cut and dry and we should fight to keep it.

6
_haha_oh_wow_ sh.itjust.works _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-06-12
#211 · Quote Reply

See, I don't really want full AR. I want a HUD, a very small number of rudimentary AR features, like floating windows for text documents or videos, physical buttons on the arms of the glasses, small drivers by the ears for audio, and battery life that will last most of the day. I already have to wear glasses and if I'm paying more for extra features I want ones that will last the whole time I m...

If that's all you want, making something that just clips onto your existing glasses might be pretty viable.

1
scott_anon_21 lemmy.ca scott_anon_21@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-08
#212 · Quote Reply

I picked up the Viture Luma Cyberpunk edition for like $550 USD, they're sold out now but so far I think they're okay. They definitely don't fully live up to the hype but that's part of being an early adopter in the enthusiast space I guess. The app kinda sucks and it's seriously limited, so if you're looking for that 3DoF or lightweight use on the 180VR you'll be out of luck there. The immersi...

Not incoherent at all and I appreciate you taking the time to interrupt your beauty sleep to respond. ;)

This technology space has a lot of promise but knowing when it is really ready for prime time is difficult to discern with all the hype. Sounds like it is close, or fully useable depending on use case.

You hit all the key points so no follow up questions. Thanks!

1
doingthestuff lemy.lol doingthestuff@lemy.lol
Joined: 2024-11-01
#213 · Quote Reply

Breaking someone's legs requires excessive force, so no, you would not be within your rights to break someone's legs for punching you in the face. That would absolutely be an escalation of force and not legally defendable. In order to shoot someone in self defense, you have to prove that you feared for your life. Its not a get out of jail free card.
[removed by moderator]
1
rektdeckard lemmy.world rektdeckard@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-08
#214 · (edited) Quote Reply

Couldn't people who specifically want to stealthily record people just turn off the bluetooth?

I believe Bluetooth is always on with the Meta glasses, at least the last gen. They offload everything to the phone. I got a pair as a work gift and only use them as sunglasses with headphones built-in so I can listen to podcasts on walks.

6
ToTheGraveMyLove sh.itjust.works ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2026-01-29
#215 · (edited) Quote Reply

[removed by moderator]

Again though, its not a get out of jail free card. There needs to be a clear threat to life and limb. Just being punched is not an invitation to shoot somebody. Stop spreading false and dangerous information.

0
partial_accumen lemmy.world partial_accumen@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-15
#216 · Quote Reply

There's a difference between taking a picture of a person and taking a picture of scenery or event with a person in it in Germany. It's a subtle but significant difference. And relevant when talking about do you have to expect for your picture to be taken. You may not care when your in the background or not identifiable but at the same time care when someone knows you and takes photography of y...

With your comments I found additional German legal guidance that mostly matches what you said. It appears that Germany does indeed have a portion of privacy from someone intentionally walking up to you and taking your picture. I don't think this invalidates my original point because it doesn't appear that expectation of privacy extends to installed surveillance cameras in public.

However, I appreciate having a better understanding of German law. Thank you.

2
Schadrach lemmy.sdf.org Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
Joined: 2023-07-11
#217 · Quote Reply

would these help lead to more arrest if assaults were captured on the cameras It might also help find lost puppies, but that's not a good enough reason to give up any additional amounts of privacy to the megacorporations or to a police state.

Everyone around you has a phone with a camera. Businesses and the government have additional cameras looking all over. The phone camera being less obvious and handsfree seems like an arbitrary choice of where to draw the line

1
moebiusstrop piefed.social moebiusstrop@piefed.social
Joined: 2026-02-17
#218 · Quote Reply

Github (APK) link, if you're on a privacy phone: https://github.com/yjeanrenaud/yj_nearbyglasses

11
Truscape lemmy.blahaj.zone Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Joined: 2025-06-20
#219 · Quote Reply

I mean, eventually there are going to be people with camera's stealthily integrated directly into their eyeballs recording non-stop. Like that black mirror episode letting people relive any moment from their past.

The wireless communication protocol will still be able to be intercepted. A physical port for data transfer will probably be too dangerous to the subject and prone to contamination (and infection).

0
AxExRx lemmy.world axexrx@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-06
#220 · Quote Reply

Is unsolved assault cases currently a problem? That sounds like an answer looking for a problem to me.

And I think it just means anyone deciding to commit assault just also steals/ destroys the victims phone and glasses as a default

1
AxExRx lemmy.world axexrx@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-06
#221 · Quote Reply

Admittedly, this is cyberpunk as fuck. Should not be neededโ€ฆ but itโ€™s a fucking cool solution.

Next step is for someone makes a version that hijacks the Bluetooth headphones and makes them play a loud shrill noise that makes the glasses too uncomfortable to wear in your pressence.

6
iglou programming.dev iglou@programming.dev
Joined: 2025-05-12
#222 · Quote Reply

The wireless communication protocol will still be able to be intercepted. A physical port for data transfer will probably be too dangerous to the subject and prone to contamination (and infection).

But not necessarily interpreted.

1
anomnom sh.itjust.works anomnom@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2024-11-09
#223 · Quote Reply

I remember Google Glass itself receiving a ton of outrage actually: People hated it and anyone wearing one was made fun of ("glassholes" was a popular insult at the time).

Iโ€™ll still use it for the meta garbage, but I think the reason is that the glasses are just inconspicuous enough for most normies to not notice they are being recorded. Till the moron wearing them starts staring off into space while reading tweets at least.

3
nednobbins lemmy.zip nednobbins@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-20
#224 · Quote Reply

In reply to an earlier post

If I understand your response correctly, you're arguing that the glasses themselves aren't the issue, it's the shifts that come with accepting the glasses.

They may ironically have the reverse effect. I guarantee that corporations are already cataloging your facial expressions. Between Ring, Flock, Apple, Google, Netflix, Samsung, etc. there are many pictures of all our faces with rich annotation. Currently most people don't even think about how thoroughly they're being watched. These douchy glasses may actually draw attention to the matter.

1
nednobbins lemmy.zip nednobbins@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-20
#225 · Quote Reply

In reply to an earlier post

They can produce better video than some cameras but not as good as others. 12MP ultrawide is pretty standard on security cameras and they're already all over the place.

Do you think that the current smart glasses are making surveillance more normalized or do you think that they're getting more common because we've already normalized constant surveillance?

I'd point out that the PATRIOT act passed a quarter century ago with only one "No" and one abstention.

1
nednobbins lemmy.zip nednobbins@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2025-06-20
#226 · Quote Reply

In reply to an earlier post

As does Ring, Flock, Samsung, Apple, Google and so on.
Some random person with any other hidden camera can easily upload them to creepy servers and do automatic face recognition on them too.

Steve Mann https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Mann_(inventor) has been doing that for a long time.

1
Imgonnatrythis sh.itjust.works Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-09-23
#227 · Quote Reply

In reply to an earlier post

'people like you' don't give consumers enough credit. They aren't ignorant to the privacy concerns. That's nonsense. They just don't care about them. People buying these glasses take it a step further though by disrespecting the privacy of others. For that, I will ostracize them and their apologists.
Also what so "cool" exactly to you about strapping an ip camera to your face?

-1
privatepirate lemmy.zip privatepirate@lemmy.zip
Joined: 2026-02-12
#228 · Quote Reply

'people like you' don't give consumers enough credit. They aren't ignorant to the privacy concerns. That's nonsense. They just don't care about them. People buying these glasses take it a step further though by disrespecting the privacy of others. For that, I will ostracize them and their apologists. Also what so "cool" exactly to you about strapping an ip camera to your face?

I'm not going to argue with you anymore. Let's agree to disagree ๐Ÿ‘

-1
EtherWhack lemmy.world EtherWhack@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-23
#229 · Quote Reply

In reply to an earlier post

I mean, that was sorta the point of the comment...

I don't like them and therefore, I won't be using them, ever. I'd get a less obstructing headset instead. And, I wouldn't get a headset just to play around with it, I'd actually want to use it and try to get to it help me doing things.

1
Kissaki feddit.org Kissaki@feddit.org
Joined: 2024-07-14
#230 · (edited) Quote Reply

With your comments I found additional German legal guidance that mostly matches what you said. It appears that Germany does indeed have a portion of privacy from someone intentionally walking up to you and taking your picture. I don't think this invalidates my original point because it doesn't appear that expectation of privacy extends to installed surveillance cameras in public. However, I app...

Regarding security cameras, you can't point your private security camera off your property. If you put it above your entrance, you can't point it to record the entire street.

Afaik anyway.

Parking spaces or business must visibly disclose that there's cameras, at least where they would not be generally expected. I'm not too sure about the specifics there though.

1
kent_eh lemmy.ca kent_eh@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2023-06-06
#231 · Quote Reply

Everyone around you has a phone with a camera. Businesses and the government have additional cameras looking all over. The phone camera being less obvious and handsfree seems like an arbitrary choice of where to draw the line

Spy glasses are much less obvious than using a phone camera.

2
jaaake lemmy.world jaaake@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-07-01
#232 · Quote Reply

I believe Bluetooth is always on with the Meta glasses, at least the last gen. They offload everything to the phone. I got a pair as a work gift and only use them as sunglasses with headphones built-in so I can listen to podcasts on walks.

My partner got a pair for work when they first came out (her job involves creating social media content). I was impressed by the speakers and itโ€™s the same style of sunglasses that I normally wear daily, so I got a pair for myself. It was so nice to be able to listen to stuff and take calls without carry around headphones or putting them in when the phone rang. I was already uncomfortable with the association with meta, but was able to isolate that aspect at first. As they continued to add features, Iโ€™ve started being less comfortable with them. I accidentally left them somewhere a couple months ago and decided not to replace them. Itโ€™s such a bummer that all the cool tech is now not just spying on you, but on everyone around you. Fuckin capitalism ruins everything.

3
m3t00๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ lemmy.world m3t00@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-01
#233 · Quote Reply

needs a disrupter to ignite it's batteries. js. what good is detection w/o counter measures

1
Imgonnatrythis sh.itjust.works Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
Joined: 2023-09-23
#234 · Quote Reply

I'm not going to argue with you anymore. Let's agree to disagree ๐Ÿ‘

Technically one of us is supposed to call the other a cunt at this point, but will accept your breach of protocol.

3
SaveTheTuaHawk lemmy.ca SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-07
#235 · Quote Reply

Spy glasses are much less obvious than using a phone camera.

Back to the 1960s....these were marketed to look at kids and girls.

2
SaveTheTuaHawk lemmy.ca SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-07
#236 · Quote Reply

In reply to an earlier post

Still dorky.

you must be in the US, where everyone wears these

1
SaveTheTuaHawk lemmy.ca SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-07
#237 · Quote Reply

In reply to an earlier post

ok, but they don't try and hide them do they?

3
SaveTheTuaHawk lemmy.ca SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-07
#238 · Quote Reply

I mean, that was sorta the point of the comment... I don't like them and therefore, I won't be using them, ever. I'd get a less obstructing headset instead. And, I wouldn't get a headset just to play around with it, I'd actually want to use it and try to get to it help me doing things.

It's only a matter of time before someone is arrested on suspicion of voyerism and there is evidence of him staring at some girl's boobs.

Every guy does this, but "Looking at cleavage is like looking at the sun. You don't stare at it. It's too risky. Ya get a sense of it and then you look away!"

-Jerry Seinfeld.

1
SaveTheTuaHawk lemmy.ca SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
Joined: 2025-03-07
#239 · Quote Reply

While I agree that AR glasses will become widespread, there's still time to advocate for and implement privacy focused regulations. Especially early on as people are upset about the technology While not perfect solutions, enforcing stuff such as recording LEDs and such are steps in the right direction

AR glasses will become widespread

I was picking up my new prescription glasses this week at a large mall. They had Ray Ban and Oakley Meta glasses and the clerk said they have not sold a single pair.

1
HobbitFoot thelemmy.club HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club
Joined: 2023-06-16
#240 · Quote Reply

ok, but they don't try and hide them do they?

I know one engineer who bought the Meta glasses due to the form factor. For others with the Go Pro, they usually mount the cameras on their hard hat, which makes it easy to see since black hard hats are rare.

1
m3t00๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ lemmy.world m3t00@lemmy.world
Joined: 2023-06-01
#241 · Quote Reply

are you filming this? ๐Ÿ‘Š

1
Post Reply Page 5 of 5   Goto page « First 1 ... 3, 4, 5
Back to top